Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Please help me out with this project
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Living Outside The Box
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Food vs. Nutrients
Do we need food, or just nutrients? According to some, my human nutrition professor included, we just need the nutrients. But where has this thinking really led us? We no longer consider what it is that we are putting in our bodies, just the chemical make up and daily values that will get us closer to our "perfect" diet. Where did we go so wrong? It has gotten to the point where people would actually consider eating balanced meals at McDonald's everyday would get them the nutrients necessary for life. Technically this food will give you certain amounts of nutrients, but at what cost? Protein, fat, and carbohydrates are all accounted for and packaged into a meal that would still look the same if left to sit out for two weeks! Shelf life is important here. Buying and consuming food that will spoil sooner than later and doesn't come in a box or some type of plastic packaging should be the name of the game, with an emphasis on should. Modern convenience and laziness has led to people making everything out of a box or microwavable bag of some type. Why shouldn't we focus on the actual food we eat? If you eat the proper foods, would it not follow that the nutrients will also be there?
Friday, August 28, 2009
A new Rx
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Take the Plunge!
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Organic Vs. Conventional
Recently a friend of mine made me aware of a story from CNN’s Jack Cafferty stating that organic food is no healthier or nutritious than regular conventionally raised food. Immediately I was up in arms, as I have been living the organic life for the some time now. After some good natured ribbing and a look at Mr. Cafferty’s blog post I decided to take a deeper look. The basis of the Mr. Cafferty’s declaration is a study commisioned (i.e. funded) by the U.K. government and published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. I found it strange that an american publication would be running this, but after following the money trail I can now see why. Thanks to the good people at opensecrets.org I found that big agriculture and food processing was responsible for almost 150 million dollars of donations to the U.S. government in 2008 alone. Industrialized Ag is highly tied to government, and when they smaller organic farms start to take market share they get mad, but I digress. The research team “looked” at 50,000 studies conducted over 50 years and found that there was no significant difference between organic and conventional foods. I immediately found the free abstract for the paper online, but was left wanting more. Being a curious fellow I shelled out the $8 to get a copy and get a more in depth look at the so called research.
What did I get for my 8 hard earned bucks? Six pages of what I consider to be less than thorough work on such an important and topical subject. For starters the conclusion that was arrived at was not based on 50,000 studies as you may have been led to believe, but only 55 that were consider satisfactory. Secondly, these studies were found through normal means that you or I might use when researching for a college term paper. The team stuck a few different keywords into scholarly article search engines, like pubmed.com, and hit search! I know you’re probably thinking that this is nuts, but try to keep in mind that all searching and subsequent data extraction was performed by 2 research assistants! After extraction the data had to be synthesized into hard numbers. This was tricky as the studies varied on representation of the data, controls, sample size, etc...
“Most of the studies contained no information of the sample size or variablity around central estimates. The analysis presented is therefore a pragmatic choice that permitted the available data to be used to its fullest extent. We calculated the standardized percentage difference in the reported mean nutrient content, as follows:
[(Content of nutrient in organically produced foodstuff-content of nutrient in conventionally produced foodstuff)/content of nutrient in conventionally produced foodstuff]X100.”
This leads me to believe that the research team simply pressed on to get a satisfactory result for themselves and funder, the U.K. government, to push political agendas forward. Surprising that this study is so lacking even after being subject to an independent expert review panel consisting of two people! And shocking as it may seem they were both connected to the U.K. government. What really struck me as sad was how the bulk of the discussion portion of this paper brought notice to the poor quality of the research they had found, and how limited the team was in finding better data. The actual details of nutrient content was condensed to a paragraph and a couple of tables, which were inconclusive at best. The Nutritional categories used, which again were fairly random and based on what was available, were: Nitrogen, Vitamin C, Phenolic compounds, Magnesium, Calcium, Phosphorous, Potassium, Zinc, Total Soluble Solids, Copper, and Titratable Acidity. Organic foods showed an higher value in phosphorous and titratable acidity, but lost out on nitrogen content to conventional food. On the rest they were even. Again, they were only using the standards and methodology given in this particular study. The data for livestock was an even bigger joke. Breaking down the nutrient content for meat was relegated to only two categories; Fats and Ash! Who out there is worried about Ash content in their meat? And the fats were unspecified, so we have no way of breaking down the omega-3’s versus omega-6’s. Not to mention CLA content which is proposed to be a quality source of antioxidants and anti-cancer agents. We couldn’t get anything on protein content and amino acids here either. A complete disregard of for livestock is evident. We simply need more information before such a bold claim can be made.
Moving on to what I feel is most important is the complete lack of attention given to other potentially harmful compounds found in our food. Quoting once again from the study, “We did not address difference in contaminant contents (e.g. herbicides, pesticides, or fungicide residues) or the possible environmental consequences of organic and conventional agricultural practices because this was beyond the scope of our review.” Aside from the fact that I do agree that delving into agricultural practices would be outside the realm in this case, I have to disagree with not including contaminant content. If they believe that people buy organic strictly because they feel its more nutritious then they are truly out of touch. It doesn’t matter if the Vitamin C content is the same if you ingest millions of particles of pesticides that offset any benefit you may have seen from said Vitamin C, it’s about overall health! Do a quick google search using pesticides+cancer and see what comes back. It’s staggering how much information is out there on the link between the two. I recently read an article about people in foreign countries using pesticides for suicide! Are they specifically dodging these issues? Possibly. Is it due to the government funding? Possibly. Shame on them for being so obtuse and casual about such an important subject. When large news outlets publicize things of this nature it’s downright negligent to not put in the due diligence and get to the root of the issue.
I could spend all day spouting off the benefits gained from eating organic foods, but the best way to really find out is to try it for yourself. Go to your local grocer or co-op and get one weeks worth of organic food and spend the next week eating only that food. Nothing processed or from a restaurant, just real-whole food. If you don’t feel better and more invigorated then maybe I’m just crazy, but I think you will feel a change. You have to remember that pesticides are foreign to the body, meaning that it is ill prepared to process them effectively. Nine times out of ten those harmful chemicals are being stored away in fat deposits and keep polluting the body over time. Also keep in mind that the same goes for any animal foods that you might eat. If you have a nice fatty steak from an over-drugged poorly fed animal, all the crap that was in them will now make its way into you! It’s real simple when you break it down and try to forget about all the hype surrounding these topics. Just remember to keep digging after you read some random news blurb, there is always more to the story!
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Go Barefoot
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Poo Talk
I was recently reading a book entitled The Owner-Built Home, by Ken Kern, when I stumbled onto some information I hadn't imagine I would find. The particular section was about composting and the use of a squat style toilet. These are very popular even today in popular countries. The idea of squatting in more primitive societies is not only for resting, but for ridding the body of waste. In this position we have a more natural opening of the colon and increased intra-abdominal pressure that both contribute to a full and complete excretion of waste. Think about a baby playing in your lap, and then they squat down all of a sudden and make "that" face. You have just seen a very natural bowel movement. They are just going off instinct. They don't know about in door plumbing and refined society yet, but just following what the body is telling them. Quoting from Harold Aaron's, Our Common Ailment:
"The high toilet seat may prevent complete evacuation. The natural position for defecation, assumed by primitive races, is the squatting position...When the thighs are pressed against the abdominal muscles in this position, so that the rectum is more completely emptied. Our toilets are not constructed according to physiological requirements."
I couldn't believe I was reading this type of insight in a home building book! And from the 60's no less. I did more research and found that it is indeed hard to find such a toilet these days, but it is possible. Out of the 119 toilets currently available on the American Standard website, none come close to a traditional squat type toilet. As mentioned before they are quite common in other countries, and of course with hunter gatherer tribes who don't need such conveniences, but not in the good ole U.S. of A. This is interesting to me because of our populations major issue with constipation. I'm not saying that this is entirely the reason, in fact poor food, lack of exercise, dehydration, and over-medicating are all common culprits as well. Sadly due to the rampant obesity and muscle atrophy in our "modern" world, I don't even think people could manage to squat down to use this type of toilet anyway. And many if they finally did get down there would need some type of railing system or the fire department to help them get back up!
We often lose sight of how important our surroundings are to health. Not just in regards to a squat style toilet, but the use of modern building practices which use any number of hazardous and engineered products that affect how our bodies function. What I'm really trying to get at is the connection between all the facets of our lives and how they contribute to overall health and well being. Choosing to install a squat style toilet or step, using natural products in the building of a home, eating organic food, exercising the body, getting quality sleep. All these choices are interconnected and vital to how we live and ultimately the quality of life.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Wants and Needs
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Quality, what's it all mean?
Monday, May 25, 2009
Wild Eggs
I was recently visiting my brother when his girlfriend came in with a rather large egg that she found out in their yard. Naturally I was intrigued and felt the need to crack it open. To my great surprise I found a big beautiful golden yolk inside just begging to be eaten. I threw it in a skillet for a couple of minutes and devoured it rapidly. It was delicious and tasted pure and true to nature. It doesn't get any better than wild game, so why not wild eggs? It's amazing what you can find in the great out of doors. I'm still trying to track down what type of bird it came from, so if anyone out there has a guess let me know in the comments.
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Building Real Ab Strength-The Zercher Carry
Ed Zercher was a well known strongman in the 30's who imparted one of the great exercises of all time upon the world. The Zercher squat was invented, they say, because Zercher did not have a squat rack in his gym. This version of the squat begins with a dead-lift and then a squat while moving the bar onto the legs. From there you slide your arms underneath so that the bar is positioned in the crook of your arms and then squat the weight. This is a fantastic lift that builds strength throughout the body. Today however I would like to focus on the Zercher carry. You still position the weight in the crook of the arms, but instead of squatting it you are walking for a prescribed distance and/or time. This lift/carry combination is phenomenal for building strength not only in the anterior, but posterior chain all at the same time. What this means is a rock solid mid-line, and real strength in the abdominal musculature. Using a sandbag is my preferred method, as this form of weight is also metabolically demanding. The reasoning behind this is the fact that the weight is being held on the chest and putting a force on your lungs. This is great as it will illicit diaphragmatic breathing and better engages the stabilizer muscles throughout the mid-line. My recommendation is a distance like 60 meters coupled with something very demanding on the lungs like burpee's or a front squat & push press combination. Getting the heart rate and respiration up high and then putting weight on the chest forces proper engagement of the abdominal musculature and forces diaphragmatic breathing which is great in protecting your spine, which is the sole reason for these muscles in the first place. Normally I will do about 5 rounds of this with 10 burpee's followed by a 60 meter carry and repeat. I will also use a timed carry as a warm up. Using a 60# bag and just walking for about a minute is great to get muscles firing and blood pumping, especially if your workout that day involves movements where the mid-line will be engaged. Another reason that I love this movement is because it's so applicable to everyday life. In a real world setting people can't carry things in a perfect way like they would in a gym. I put the picture to show how it should look, but also think about how often you find yourself carry things in this manner. I would venture a guess that most people out there have done something similar many times, and quite recently even. Try to remember that all this is to really prepare us for the way we move and act in our everyday life.If you use the Zercher carry in your programming I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Monday, May 18, 2009
None Better
Sunday, May 17, 2009
My First Recipe Post!!!
Jeff's Protein Packed Meatloaf
-1 pound grass fed beef
-1 pound organic pork sausage
-1 package organic bacon
-2 white onion, diced
-2 cloves of garlic, minced
-3 whole eggs, free range & local!
-1/4 cup fresh parsley
-1/3 cup organic raw shredded coconut
-2 tablespoons flax oil
-seasoning to taste ( I used a dash of sea salt, fresh ground black pepper, cayenne pepper, and cumin)
Pre-heat your oven to 400 and prep your bacon in a baking dish of your choice. I used a metal bread pan, but you can use anything really. I laid the bacon in overlapping strips, but it could be done in any number of different styles. Pick the one you like best and roll. To be fair you could skip the bacon bed, or simply dice that up and add it to the mix. I chose to wrap the meat in bacon to help lock in the flavor and keep it as moist as possible. Next combine all your ingredients in a large mixing bowl, making sure to incorporate them thoroughly. You could whisk the eggs in a separate bowl first but I like adding them in whole and working the mix with my hands. When you're ready move your mix into the baking dish and finish wrapping the bacon. Bake for 45 minutes and then let set. When cooled sufficiently plate and cut or just dig in. This took me approximately 10 minutes to prep everything, and then I just had to wait while it baked. Super easy and a great way to have some ready to go protein when needed. The other great part is you can mix and match ingredients however you like. You could use beef, turkey, chicken, pork, lamb, etc... for your meat choice, and add or subtract the other fillers. I made this tonight, and it was the bomb! The coconut adds a slight hint of sweetness and gets you some extra quality fat. Let me know what you all think out there, and feel free to send me some of your own recipe's that you think others would enjoy. Peace!
Getting ready for the oven...
Finished product. Mmm..Mmm..Good!!!